Vulnerabilities, closed.
Here is how it goes.
Connect your scanners.
Wiz, GuardDuty, CrowdStrike, Sentry, and Dependabot. Everything lands in one queue.
Every finding gets a plan.
Hiro writes the fix and the rollout plan. The risk engine grades each plan, so low-risk changes ship on their own and risky ones wait for you.
The queue drains.
Fixes ship as pull requests and infrastructure changes, tested in a sandbox before they deploy.
New findings do not pile up.
Whatever your scanners raise tomorrow gets a plan and a fix the same way, and the count stays near zero.
Hiro fixes what your scanners find.
Hiro does the work. You make the calls.
- Triage across every source
- The fix, the tests, and the deploy
- GuardDuty and scanner alerts, worked to closed
- Rollbacks if the metrics regress
- The action log your auditor reads
- Approving the risky changes
- Setting what auto-applies
- Calling what risk is acceptable
What teams ask us.
Does Hiro replace my scanners?
No. Hiro is not a scanner. It sits downstream of the ones you already run and does the part they leave behind: the fix.
What if a fix breaks something?
Every change is tested in a sandbox before it applies and watched after with its own metrics. If they regress, Hiro rolls the change back automatically and writes down why.
How is this different from Dependabot auto-PRs?
Dependabot bumps dependencies. Hiro works the whole queue: cloud configuration, IAM, code issues, and alerts, and it tests changes against your app before deploying them.
Can it just fix what my scanner finds?
That is the whole product. Wiz, GuardDuty, CrowdStrike, Sentry, and Dependabot findings come in, and tested pull requests and infrastructure changes go out.
Does it handle GuardDuty alerts?
Yes. GuardDuty alerts land in the same queue as scanner findings, so cloud issues get fixed instead of acknowledged.