SOC 2, implemented.
Here is how it goes.
Connect your stack.
Vanta or Drata, plus GitHub, AWS, Google Workspace, and Okta.
Every red monitor gets a plan.
Hiro maps each failing monitor to a concrete fix and starts opening pull requests.
Monitors flip green.
Fixes land through the same review, test, deploy line as everything Hiro ships. Evidence attaches as each control goes live.
Nothing to scramble for.
You walk in with monitors green and a timestamped evidence packet your auditor can actually use.
Hiro implements the controls auditors check.
Hiro does the work. You make the calls.
- The fix behind every failing monitor
- Evidence collection and attachment
- Policies drafted to match your systems
- Quarterly access reviews, end to end
- Vulnerability remediation on SLA
- Approving the risky changes
- Deciding who keeps admin access
- Picking the auditor and the audit window
- The auditor interview
What founders ask us.
Does Hiro replace Vanta or Drata?
No. Your compliance platform stays the system of record. Hiro is the engineer working the list it flags: it fixes the control, attaches the evidence, and the monitor goes green.
Type I or Type II?
Both. Type I needs the controls in place, Type II needs them holding over the audit window. Hiro implements the controls and keeps them enforced, so drift gets fixed before it becomes a finding.
We have not bought a compliance platform yet. Is it too early?
No. Hiro fixes the underlying controls either way, and when you do connect Vanta or Drata, the monitors start green instead of red.
Can Hiro just do my Vanta work for me?
Yes. Connect Vanta and the failing-monitor backlog becomes Hiro’s queue: it implements each control in your infrastructure, attaches the evidence, and the monitor flips green. Same for Drata.
Does Hiro work with our auditor?
Yes. Hiro produces what auditors ask for: timestamped evidence mapped to controls, exportable as a packet. Your auditor does not need to change how they work.